University Professor I Of Counsel
University Professor I Of Counsel
Prof. Dr. Dr. Frauke Rostalski is Of Counsel to the firm and holds the Chair of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Philosophy of Law and Comparative Law at the Faculty of Law at the University of Cologne. She contributes her expertise in criminal procedural law and commercial criminal law to the firm in selected cases. She is also active in prestigious committees on technology regulation, including KI-NRW and the Plattform Lernende Systeme. With this specialist background, she is driving forward advice on the increasingly important issue of AI compliance. Prof. Rostalski is a regular expert for the German Bundestag, various state parliaments and parliamentary groups.
Studied law in Marburg
Referendariat at the Marburg Regional Court
Doctorate at the Faculty of Law of the Philipps University of Marburg ("Gesinnung und Straftat", Dunker & Humblot)
Doctorate at the Faculty of Philosophy of the Friedrich Schiller University Jena ("Das Natürlichkeitsargument bei
biotechnologischen Maßnahmen", Dunker & Humblot)
Habilitation at the Philipps University of Marburg ("Der Tatbegriff im Strafrecht", Mohr Siebeck)
University Professor Holder of the Chair of Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure Law, Philosophy of Law and Comparative Law at the University of Cologne
GermanEthics Council
Berkeley Center on Comparative Equality and Anti-Discrimination Law at the University of California, Berkeley
Artificial Intelligence Competence Platform North Rhine-Westphalia (KI.NRW)
Learning systems platform
Board of Trustees of the Fraunhofer Institute for Intelligent Analysis and Information Systems IAIS, Bonn.
Prof. Rostalski publishes in the fields of criminal law, criminal procedure law, commercial criminal law, medical criminal law and on selected compliance issues, among others:
"Verfassungswidrigkeit des wahldeutigen Schuldspruchs - Zum eindeutigen Schuldspruch als dem zentralen Element der Bestrafung" (publication together with Georg Freund), JZ 2015, 164-170 and conclusion, JZ 2015, 716
The scope of the presumption of innocence in (acquittal) judgments - At the same time, discussion of ECtHR No. 48144/09 - Judgment of January 15, 2015 (Cleve v. Germany), HRRS 2015, 315
On the problem of the "basic agreement under antitrust law" and the uniform and continuous infringement as legal institutions - considerations on the occasion of antitrust fine proceedings against German car manufacturers, NZWiSt 2017, 382
Exemption from punishment and mitigation of punishment in criminal tax law as legal institutes, JR 2018, 620.
On the legitimacy of measures of an accusatory nature and those of pure asset recovery in (new) antitrust fine law, NZWiSt 2018, 169.
The European Commission's draft AI regulation (publication together with Erik Weiss), ZfDR 2021, 329.
Trustworthy use of artificial intelligence in Germany and Europe, In: Tagungsband "Künstliche Intelligenz: Wie gelingt eine vertrauenswürdige Verwendung in Deutschland und Europa?", ed. by BMJV and Frauke Rostalski, Mohr Siebeck, 2023, p. 251.
Prohibited AI practices (Art. 5 AI Regulation), in: "Die neue Verordnung der EU zur Künstlichen Intelligenz. Technische Grundlagen, Rechtsprobleme, Rechtsfolgen" (publication together with Erik Weiss), ed. by Eric Hilgendorf and David Roth-Isigkeit, C.H. Beck, 2023, p. 35.
Die Menschenrechte und der Begriff der prozessualen Tat, in: anthology "Menschenrechte als Alpha und Omega des Rechts?", ed. by Angelika Nußberger (2023).
German
English
